Reaction mixed to IUPatty’s prohibition proposal

State Rep. Dave Reed, R-Indiana. Photo courtesy of Philly.com.

By Logan Hullinger

INDIANA –- Two weeks ago, state Rep. Dave Reed called for an end to the annual IUPatty’s revel and ruckus and invited “all in our community to make it happen.” Reaction among local officials, university administrators and students has ranged from support to opposition.

Kaycee E. Newell, a member of the borough council, is skeptical.

“If Dave Reed has some magic solution to stop 18-to-24-year-olds from partying, I’d love to hear it,” wrote Newell in an April 3 email. “I think Rep. Reed needs to reevaluate his priorities.”

More important priorities, according to Newell, include what she described as a “highly unpopular” local-school-board proposal to close two elementary schools in the borough and to build or rebuild two others outside town. The plan, Newell wrote, “would leave the Indiana Borough without neighborhood schools and would significantly increase property taxes.”

 

SOME INDIANA UNIVERSITY of Pennsylvania students shared Newell’s skepticism.

“They can’t stop students,” said Simone B. Covert, a freshman psychology major, in an April 4 social gathering at an off-campus residence. “They’re going to party no matter what. Maybe the people against it could put their efforts somewhere else rather than do the impossible.”

Tyler C. Shingleton, a junior criminology major, agreed.

“You can’t stop people from having parties — period,” Shingleton said at the same gathering. “The beer distributors, restaurants and bars have to make a lot of money for the borough, as well, during IUPatty’s.”

One Philadelphia Street restaurant owner agreed.

“The event is just a social media phenomenon that brings in a lot of money to the community,” Timothy M. McQuaide, owner of the The Coney, said during an April 5 phone interview. “Here on Philly Street, I don’t see any problem with what’s been going on.”

Like Reed, McQuaide suggested that local officials re-examine the annual event, but without a prohibitionist approach.

“It’s time to start rethinking this,” McQuaide said.

 

THE OWNER OF ANOTHER downtown watering hole, however, said IUPatty’s costs outweigh its benefits.

“The idea of putting an end to it doesn’t bother me,” Harry Spielman, owner of H.B. Culpeppers on Philadelphia Street, said during an April 5 phone interview. “It’s just a liability, and I don’t make much money off of it.”

Borough council President Peter Broad said the bad outweighed the good.

“Business owners who profited from the debauchery did, indeed, profit greatly,” Broad said in a April 4 email. “However, theirs was a unique and unshared experience.”

Broad added that Reed’s position is widely shared among constituents.

“This year’s celebration was way over the top,” Broad said. “It really was something students should be ashamed of.”

________________

‘Business owners who profited from the debauchery did, indeed, profit greatly. However, theirs was a unique and unshared experience…. This year’s celebration was way over the top. It really was something students should be ashamed of.’

                                                  — Indiana borough council President Peter Broad
________________

University spokeswoman Michelle S. Fryling, the voice of a group of landlords, police, university administrators and others organized to rein in the annual event, expressed support for Reed’s “zero tolerance” policy.

“We completely agree with Rep. Reed’s comments,” Fryling wrote in a March 29 email, “including addressing the violence, gun presence and other criminal activities that happened off-campus over the weekend.”

 

BOROUGH POLICE, however, described IUPatty’s this year as unexceptional.

“During the weekend of the celebration, we received a 258 percent increase in calls of service,” police Chief William C. Sutton said in an April 4 police-office interview. “This is average for the weekend of the celebration — besides last year, when we had a fairly tame weekend.”

His department received 220 phone calls for service and pressed 87 criminal charges from Thursday, March 23, to Sunday, March 26, Sutton said. He described the statistics as “fairly normal.”

The two shootings that took place off-campus were outliers, Sutton said. Neither involved current IUP students, according to news reports.

 

SUTTON DECLINED comment on Reed’s proposal. Other local officials who declined comment include:

  • Rep. Reed
  • IUP President Michael A. Driscoll
  • IUP’s Student Government Association President Brian H. Swatt
  •  Indiana Borough Chamber of Commerce
  • 10 of 12 Indiana borough council members
  • Two rental-agency members of the Indiana Landlord Association — Oak Grove Realty and Dynamic Real Estate Management

__________

Logan R. Hullinger, junior journalism major at Indiana University of Pennsylvania from Clarion, is a staff reporter for The HawkEye. He may be contacted at L.R.Hullinger@iup.edu

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Reaction mixed to IUPatty’s prohibition proposal

  1. Mitch Raney says:

    Students need to realize that it is not their usual parties that people are rallying against. It is the influx of people from out-of-town that makes IUPatty’s Day so unpopular with the locals. The crowds are simply too large to be controlled when students host those from off campus and promote this event to students from other schools out of the area.

  2. James says:

    I’d be curious to look at statistics from the previous Homecoming weekend. Also, being difficult however, statistics from previous years to see if the violence is trending up. Will have to say, how will you implement this ‘zero tolerance’?

    Also, very well written article.

  3. Bridget McCracken says:

    I have lived in this town all my life. I have no problem with students having fun. that being said, this is not about having fun. this is about the invasion and total chaos that happens when an open invitation goes out on social media. if the students wish to party that’s fine, just stop sending out the invite! there is no reason to have the town in which you have chosen to get an education suffer the chaos!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s