IUP faculty union president: Why I will strike

Opinion

Nadene A. L'Amoreaux, Ph.D., president of the IUP chapter of APSCUF, the statewide union of faculty members and coaches.

Nadene A. L’Amoreaux, Ph.D., president of the IUP chapter of APSCUF, the statewide union of faculty members and coaches.

By Nadene A. L’Amoreaux

INDIANA – Next week, faculty members and coaches at Indiana University of Pennsylvania and our sister universities across the commonwealth will vote on whether to authorize a strike. We will vote in the face of a threat to college education in the state of Pennsylvania.

We grow increasingly discontented with a Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education that has failed to implore the General Assembly to adequately fund higher education. That has allowed tuition increases across the State System to place greater financial burden on students and their families, thereby making the possibility of higher education to become further out of reach for our students.

Pennsylvania ranks third highest in the nation for student loan debt. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, funding cuts are accompanied by tuition hikes and cuts in campus staff and programs, which in turn lead to decline in the quality of education. Cuts to our higher education system are making college less affordable and are threatening the quality of education students receive at the state’s public four-year and community colleges. Per-student funding for our public colleges and universities is 33 percent below 2008 levels, while tuition costs have increased more than $2,200. Only five states have cut higher education funding more than Pennsylvania (Arizona, Illinois, Louisiana, South Carolina and Alabama).

THIS IS personal for me. I am a first-generation college student. I grew up in small town in Ohio. My great-grandfather died in a coal-mining accident in West Virginia. Neither of my grandmothers finished high school.

I was a member of the working poor class, and higher education was a dream that my parents had for their children, but the reality was very unlikely. Vocations that were likely to be my path included unskilled labor. Although manufacturing seemed stable at that time, there was little to no economic growth, including new jobs available for high school graduates. Within six months of my father’s retirement from GE, the plant in which he spent his entire working life closed.

Soon most, if not all remaining manufacturing and industry followed GE. This left the area desolate with no substantial economic resources outside of the local public school system, a privately run prison, and a hospital. My hometown exists on service-related jobs, and it has experienced the trappings that come with no hope and limited resources: increased crime and poverty, which in turn deters businesses and families who can contribute to the local tax base from moving in to the area. Now, the town I grew up in is not able to sustain a grocery store.

If it were not for higher education, I would have few prospects to exist or to raise my family. Higher education was the path out of poverty for my brothers and me. Higher education enabled us to expand our dreams, and create futures for our children that my parents and grandparents could only imagine. It provided opportunities that I never knew existed, and it forced me to consider perspectives that I had not encountered in my limited experience with the world.

 

WHEN we do not demand that public education and higher education be adequately funded by the state, we are complicit in creating a situation in which we contribute to furthering the economic divide between those who have and those who do not. We perpetuate poverty in our state by failing to provide future generations with opportunities.

And we become morally bankrupt by limiting the social and economic opportunities that keep our citizens uneducated and untrained — unprepared for the work opportunities that our communities need to be vital, vibrant, relevant. If students are not able to afford a quality education, if they are unable to show up in our universities, we educators cannot do what we do. Our colleges and universities cannot be vital, vibrant and relevant. We will not be able to grow and adapt to the changing needs of a global economy.

It is beyond reprehensible that the State System’s chancellor has failed to demand adequate funding for higher education. Worse, he perpetuates an erroneous belief that the faculty who work for him work only 17 hours per week, are under-worked and overpaid, and that this erroneous belief has gone unchallenged.

The problem with higher-education funding does not rest with the salary and benefits of the faculty; it rests with complacency in an underfunded State System of Higher Education. It rests with state legislators who are short-sighted in their vision for the commonwealth and who believe that state-owned universities operate like grocery stores and vineyards: They see our students as commodities rather than as the hope for our future.

While citing faculty payroll as a contributing factor to rising tuition costs, the State System seems to have overlooked the proliferation of administrative positions that far outpace faculty positions over the past 10 years. The State System has ignored substantial salary increases that have been granted to some administrators, while faculty and coaches are entering a second year with essentially a salary freeze.

 

THIS IS why I am willing to go on strike, this is why I am ready to take a stand. It is not merely about my salary and benefits. It is about the salary and benefits of my children and their generation, of the doctors, lawyers, scientists, mechanics, plumbers and school teachers in my community, now and into the future. It is about the quality of their training and education, and the integrity of our educational institutions. It is about the possibilities.

I do not want to strike. But I will, if needed to ensure the opportunity of quality higher education for current and future generations.

Nadene A. L’Amoreaux, Ph.D., has been a faculty member in the Indiana University of Pennsylvania Department of Counseling since 1999. In spring 2016, she was elected president of the IUP chapter of APSCUF, the statewide union of faculty members and coaches. This article is adapted from her remarks at the university’s Aug. 26 opening-day ceremonies.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Opinion, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to IUP faculty union president: Why I will strike

  1. lcm says:

    Reblogged this on WMU-AAUP Blog and commented:
    Thoughtful and important piece by Dr. Nadene A. L’Amoreaux, president of the Indiana University of Pennsylvania chapter of APSCUF, the statewide union of faculty members and coaches.

  2. Joseph says:

    I completely disagree. The vast majority of degrees offer no road toward employment or a tangible economic prospect. The state education system rendered to students as economic assets when I graduated a decade ago. The staff ,at all levels, viewed our increasing numbers as a direct means of padding salary and excusing inflated and corrupt crony building projects.

    After paying tens of thousands of dollars for multiple higher degrees, I attempted to visit the state university career services. I was presented with jobs paying on par with Sheetz and McDonald’s. The staff had zero concern for backing up the value of the degree with actual job market research or prospects. Beyond this, my outrage over the expense of the degree and the attitude of staff was met with hostile rudeness, as if it offended them to have to be accountable.

    At no point have the state schools justified the cost of tuition, building projects, and salaries vs the actual marketablity and gain of most of these programs. The author states that higher education was her path to economic success. I am sure it was. Much like any other pyramid scheme, those who entered early and remain at the top do profit. They need the rest of us to keep buying in.

    With a PhD, I faced the prospect of 300 to 1 applications to new hires. Ironically, the education of the applicants from private schools far exceeded my own in terms of course work that was avalible and substance of degree work. Take a good look at most of the teachers credentials. You will see most of them are not being hired from alumni… Odd, if the degree quality is good enough to blow your own horn over.

    Instead, I left the state education system feeling drained and defeated, yet carrying a debt that offered no time or luxury to recover. I was forced to work 80 hour weeks to pay for these salaries that the teachers cry are not enough. A two year pay freeze? What a travesty. It isn’t like the rest of us didn’t go through a recession and basically suffer a decade long pay freeze, but far be it that new porche isn’t in the driveway of your $300,000 house.

    Of course, I love how the teachers use the position to push politics. They make sure to spread propaganda and encourage students with unequivicated bias to vote for issues they favor. While these teachers receive excellent healthcare, we now pay a penalty for not having it or a quarter of our wages, if not more, to pay for a service we cannot afford to use. Perhaps, they might try living like the rest of us. They spend to much time with their heads up in the academic clouds with criticism and debate coming only in the form of backpatting.

    Far be it that you are lucky enough to land a job as a professor now. The older tenured teachers have great salaries and benefits. This comes at the price of exploiting new hires. They refuse to grant a full position and ensure the budget allows that older teachers need to lower increasing standard of living costs, while new teachers make benefits roughly equal to being a fast food manager.

    On top of this, the state schools have allowed private enterprise on campuses. In essence, they use tax payer money to supplement food chains and other services that compete diverectly with private businesses in the local towns. This is yet other example of the unyielding greedy they promote. These towns supported them for decades and built up around them, only to be slowly replaced with on campus services that can exploit any larger market gains with an unfair competitive edge. I can really see how such figures value the working class people.

    Of course, you also have the fact that public unions are unethical and inappropriate. In all reality, the union is represented against the students. Yet, the student is not informed properly of this position and is left to be convienced they share the side of the very teachers who stand against them in term of future expenses. This is also true of the tax payer. At no point should any union be able to strike against the general tax payer, as there is no direct representation.

    I have faith in the vast network of state private schools. They have higher rankings and much better job placement. With the hike of tuition in consideration, they are not much higher in price. They compete fairly in a private market with appropriate representation. I say hire the whole lot of these teachers and close these schools. Free up that state money for better use or private university tuition assistance. Let those schools expand to fit the need that arises. I can promise they will do so with far greater responsibility.

    I feel the biggest insult comes from the timing. These students just arrived and their tuition checks just cleared. Greed… The university now has funding that it can use immediately, while the students fund this strike. Did you ever consider that these parents took days off work to transport these students? These students left better paying jobs at home. The expense of moving was substantial. Yet, the irrisponsible union does not care that others were harmed. These teachers care only that the timing fits their cause and unrealistic desires.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s